Big Brother in HD: Texas Sues TV Makers for Spying on What You Watch

-

If you thought the worst thing your smart TV could do was suggest another true-crime documentary at 2 a.m., Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton just raised the stakes. 

Paxton has filed separate lawsuits against five major television manufacturers — Samsung, Sony, LG, Hisense, and TCL — alleging that their built-in Automated Content Recognition (ACR) systems secretly record what people watch in their homes and sell that data on the open market. 

If the complaints are true, your binge habits may have been monetized one screenshot at a time.

What the Lawsuits Say (the short, very alarming version)

According to the filings, the manufacturers installed ACR software that takes screenshots of the TV display roughly every 500 milliseconds — that’s two screenshots per second — and monitors viewing across streaming apps, cable, and input sources like gaming consoles or Blu-ray players. 

The state claims this data is then transmitted back to the manufacturers and, allegedly, onward to third parties for targeted advertising — all without consumers’ explicit, informed consent. 

Paxton says those practices violate the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act and amount to an “uninvited, invisible digital invader” in the home. 

The suits seek civil penalties and injunctive relief to stop the collection and sale of ACR data.

Texas also moved quickly to cut off one alleged offender: a temporary restraining order (TRO) has been secured against Hisense, immediately halting its data-collection activities while the litigation proceeds. 

The TRO signals the state court found at least some immediate legal reason to pause the allegedly questionable behavior.

Why the China Connection Matters in this Case

The complaints single out Hisense and TCL for additional scrutiny because both companies are based in China. 

Paxton’s filings express national-security concerns, warning that China’s national security laws could allow the Chinese government access to consumer viewing data.

 

In blunt language, the lawsuits call the devices “Chinese-sponsored surveillance devices,” arguing that the potential for foreign state access elevates the risk beyond ordinary privacy harms. 

Those allegations are part legal claim, part public-policy alarm bell — and they’re sure to intensify political and regulatory attention.

How Manufacturers are Responding (or not)

At the time of the filings, several companies declined to discuss the cases. 

Sony, LG, and Hisense have said it is their policy not to comment on pending litigation. 

The suits against Samsung and TCL likewise set the scene for protracted courtroom fights; the companies will almost certainly argue they obtained consent in privacy policies or that ACR is lawful and widely disclosed. 

The legal question will hinge on what notice and consent consumers actually received, how granular that consent was, and whether Texas law treats this kind of data collection as a deceptive trade practice.

Practical Takeaway for Viewers and Shoppers

Paxton’s office issued a consumer alert explaining that users have a right to privacy in their homes and offering general guidance on disabling ACR in TV settings. 

The details vary by model and firmware, but the typical steps are: check your TV’s privacy or viewing-data settings, opt out of “viewing data,” turn off voice or smart features you don’t use, and update your device’s software. 

If you’re concerned, the state suggests contacting the manufacturer and your retailer for more explicit instructions — and keeping records if you were told the TV wouldn’t collect personal viewing data.

Why This Case Matters

Beyond the immediate courtroom drama, the lawsuits raise broader questions about how much surveillance we tolerate in the name of convenience and personalization. 

ACR can power useful features (automatic content recognition for remote control guides, for example), but when the telemetry leaves your living room and becomes a commodity, regulators — and consumers — push back. 

If Texas prevails, it could reshape disclosure standards and push manufacturers to adopt stronger on-screen consent flows, clearer default settings, or more stringent limitations on what telemetry is collected and sold.

For now, the litigation is raw, partisan and high-stakes: privacy advocates cheer the scrutiny, industry groups warn of lost innovation or fractured advertising markets, and millions of streamers are left asking whether the next recommended episode is truly just a suggestion — or a sold data point.


Little-Known Intelligence Agency Attempts Glow-Up: “We’re Totally Not Watching You. Maybe.”

“No paywall. No puppets. Just local truth. Chip in $3 today” at https://buymeacoffee.com/doublejeopardynews

“Enjoy this content without corporate censorship? Help keep it that way.”

“Ad-Free. Algorithm-Free. 100% Independent. Support now.”

#BigBrotherInHD #TexasSuesTVMakers #KenPaxton #AutomatedContentRecognition #ACR #TVPrivacy #HisenseTRO #TCL #Samsung #Sony #LG #DataForSale #ConsumerPrivacy #ChineseSponsoredSurveillance #TurnOffACR

Sources summary (brief): Court filings and public complaint summaries from the Texas Attorney General’s office alleging ACR data capture and sale by Samsung, Sony, LG, Hisense, and TCL under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act; reporting on an emergency temporary restraining order (TRO) obtained against Hisense; public statements from manufacturers noting standard policy of non-comment on pending litigation; and a consumer alert issued by the Texas AG’s office with guidance on disabling ACR features in smart TVs. (All allegations described above are from the lawsuits; companies’ defenses and final outcomes will be determined in court.)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Please Help Find These Forgotten Girls Held at Male Juvenile Prison for Over a Year!

-
Image
  MY MOST IMPORTANT STORY  Dozens of Forgotten Little Girls Held at Male Juvenile Prison for Over a Year! Welcome to the Sunshine State, where the palm trees sway, the alligators lurk, and the legislative process makes Kafka look like a life coach!  Florida House Bill HB21 . Not just a compensation bill but possibly a 20 million dollar "Stay out of Jail Free" card for some folks. This is a bill that does some good—but also trips over its own shoelaces, falls down a staircase, and lands on a historical oversight so big, it might as well have its own zip code! An oversight that overlooks what I consider to be its most vulnerable victims! The Setup: Justice with a Catch HB21 was enacted on July 1, 2024 to compensate victims of abuse from two male juvenile detention facilities located in Florida, Dozier and Okeechobee.  It says, “Hey, survivors of abuse between 1940 and 1975, here’s some compensation for the horrific things you endured!” Sounds good, right? Like a...
Read more

Here's A New HOA Rule Dictating What You Can Do Inside Your Home

-
Image
HOA Overreach: When Your Own Home Isn’t Really Your Own The joys of homeownership—the American dream!  That magical place where you can paint the walls any color you like, blast your music (within reason), and enjoy the simple pleasure of—wait, never mind..... Turns out, your HOA might have something to say about what you do inside your own four walls. Case in point: A longtime homeowner, who has peacefully lived in his residence for 25 years, was blindsided when his HOA suddenly banned smoking inside individual homes.  That’s right—after a quarter-century of no issues, he was informed that lighting up indoors was no longer an option.  The new rule, passed at the HOA’s annual meeting by a majority vote, now restricts smoking to a designated outdoor area. Now, while some might see this as a health-conscious decision, the homeowner—whose wife is a smoker—sees it as an unfair overreach.  In a letter to a local publication, he expressed frustration, writing, “I’ve live...
Read more

Postal Police Stuck Behind ‘Keep Out’ Signs While Mailmen Face Muggers: You Can’t Make This Stuff Up!!

-
Image
As crime against letter carriers surges, one would think that America’s armed, uniformed Postal Police might be hitting the streets to protect our mail.  Instead, they’re still glued to their post office entrances like sentries guarding Fort Frownmore.  Why?  Because since 2020, the Postmaster General decreed they must “protect postal property” only—meaning, they currently serve as glorified lobby bouncers rather than actual roaming guardians of the mailstream. “ They’re robbing letter carriers, they’re sticking a gun in a letter carrier’s face and they’re demanding arrow keys, ” laments Frank Albergo , president of the National Postal Police Union and a Postal Police Officer himself.  An "arrow key" in the context of the Post Office is a specialized, universal key that postal workers use to access various locked mail receptacles, including collection boxes, apartment mailboxes, and cluster boxes. Albergo isn’t exaggerating—research shows over 100 physical assaul...
Read more