No Jack-O’-Lantern, No Justice: The Reese’s Pumpkin Lawsuit That Won't Die

-

If you bought a Reese’s “pumpkin” this past Halloween expecting a grinning jack-o’-lantern and instead received what can only be described as a smooth, peanut-butter-filled “chocolate blob,” congratulations — you may be the protagonist in the next great American courtroom confectionary drama!

A group of consumers originally sued Hershey in May 2024 in Fort Lauderdale federal court, alleging they paid a premium for Reese’s peanut butter pumpkins because the wrapper shows a pumpkin-shaped chocolate with triangle eyes and a grin carved through to the filling. 

Instead, the plaintiffs say, customers unwrapped a face-free mound and, apparently, a lifetime of disappointment. 

The original suit sought at least $5 million in damages and was filed by Anthony Russo of the Russo Firm in Boca Raton, Florida. 

U.S. District Judge Melissa Damian initially tossed the suit out, concluding that the plaintiffs’ complaints “all boil down to their subjective, personal expectations" — a legal way of saying: fancy packaging doesn't equal guaranteed facial features. 

But Judge Damian left the plaintiffs a sling and some duct tape: she allowed them to amend their complaint because the original filing lacked details on what the plaintiffs might have paid for the candy had the wrapper been less imaginative.

Enter the amended complaint, stage left, brandishing spreadsheets like a medieval mace. 

The plaintiffs now say they have pricing data showing the pumpkin-shaped Reese’s cost about 20% more per ounce at Target and Walmart — and a chewy 25% more on Hershey’s own website. 

“That same-brand differential is concrete, measurable, and material,” the plaintiffs argue, which is lawyer jargon for “we have numbers, judge — and they’re not pretty.”

Hershey’s response was succinct and scar-less: lawyers for the chocolate colossus called the amended complaint a “futile effort to resurrect this meritless case.”

Hershey’s legal team (from Shook, Hardy & Bacon) previously argued that “no reasonable consumer would be deceived into thinking that the individual candies were carved with faces.” 

They point to what they say is a helpful caveat on the packaging — the words “decorating suggestion” printed right next to the jack-o’-lantern image — and a picture of the candy without carvings and with a bite taken out of it. 

As partner Daniel Rogers wrote, that partially eaten image should tip off anyone “exercising basic common sense that the candy will not appear exactly as imagined on the package.” 

Rogers added, wryly, that nobody expects to buy food “with a huge chunk bitten out.”

This case sits in a growing legal trend: so-called price premium claims. 

Consumers increasingly sue over allegedly misleading labels, arguing they wouldn’t have paid as much — or wouldn’t have bought the product at all — had the packaging been more honest. 

Success hinges on the ability to link deception to measurable economic harm; fail to make that connection, and the suit often collapses like a sad chocolate mold!

The Reese’s plaintiffs seem to have learned that lesson from earlier lost causes. 

Remember the 2022 Publix cough-drops case about “honey-lemon” imagery? 

That one was dismissed after a judge found plaintiffs failed to show similar lozenges without lemon imagery actually sold for less. 

Packaging outrage without a price differential is courtroom confetti — fun, but legally irrelevant...

Whether the Reese’s pumpkin case rises again depends on whether the court accepts the amended complaint and whether the plaintiffs’ price comparisons hold up under cross-examination — and in aisle comparisons at Target, Walmart, and Hershey.com. 

If the judge lets the suit proceed, the nation may get to watch a class-action spectacle where economic injury is measured not by emotional disappointment but by a per-ounce calculus of pumpkin-shaped sorrow.

In the meantime, candy lovers can take practical solace: you can probably still buy actual jack-o’-lanterns — carved by hand, sold at pumpkin patches, fully consenting to facial features — and they might even be cheaper per ounce!


Trick or Treat?? -- Candy Warehouse Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Just Before Halloween

“No paywall. No puppets. Just local truth. Chip in $3 today” at https://buymeacoffee.com/doublejeopardynews

“Enjoy this content without corporate censorship? Help keep it that way.”

“Ad-Free. Algorithm-Free. 100% Independent. Support now.”

#ReesesLawsuit #ChocolateJustice #PumpkinGate #SweetToothScandal #NoJackOLanternNoPeace #CandyCourtroom #LegalTreatsNotTricks #HersheyHustle #ClassActionCrunch #PumpkinBlobGate #SweetDeception #TrickOrSue #SnackLitigationNation #JudgeVsChocolate #PeanutButterProsecution

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Please Help Find These Forgotten Girls Held at Male Juvenile Prison for Over a Year!

-
Image
  MY MOST IMPORTANT STORY  Dozens of Forgotten Little Girls Held at Male Juvenile Prison for Over a Year! Welcome to the Sunshine State, where the palm trees sway, the alligators lurk, and the legislative process makes Kafka look like a life coach!  Florida House Bill HB21 . Not just a compensation bill but possibly a 20 million dollar "Stay out of Jail Free" card for some folks. This is a bill that does some good—but also trips over its own shoelaces, falls down a staircase, and lands on a historical oversight so big, it might as well have its own zip code! An oversight that overlooks what I consider to be its most vulnerable victims! The Setup: Justice with a Catch HB21 was enacted on July 1, 2024 to compensate victims of abuse from two male juvenile detention facilities located in Florida, Dozier and Okeechobee.  It says, “Hey, survivors of abuse between 1940 and 1975, here’s some compensation for the horrific things you endured!” Sounds good, right? Like a...
Read more

Here's A New HOA Rule Dictating What You Can Do Inside Your Home

-
Image
HOA Overreach: When Your Own Home Isn’t Really Your Own The joys of homeownership—the American dream!  That magical place where you can paint the walls any color you like, blast your music (within reason), and enjoy the simple pleasure of—wait, never mind..... Turns out, your HOA might have something to say about what you do inside your own four walls. Case in point: A longtime homeowner, who has peacefully lived in his residence for 25 years, was blindsided when his HOA suddenly banned smoking inside individual homes.  That’s right—after a quarter-century of no issues, he was informed that lighting up indoors was no longer an option.  The new rule, passed at the HOA’s annual meeting by a majority vote, now restricts smoking to a designated outdoor area. Now, while some might see this as a health-conscious decision, the homeowner—whose wife is a smoker—sees it as an unfair overreach.  In a letter to a local publication, he expressed frustration, writing, “I’ve live...
Read more

Postal Police Stuck Behind ‘Keep Out’ Signs While Mailmen Face Muggers: You Can’t Make This Stuff Up!!

-
Image
As crime against letter carriers surges, one would think that America’s armed, uniformed Postal Police might be hitting the streets to protect our mail.  Instead, they’re still glued to their post office entrances like sentries guarding Fort Frownmore.  Why?  Because since 2020, the Postmaster General decreed they must “protect postal property” only—meaning, they currently serve as glorified lobby bouncers rather than actual roaming guardians of the mailstream. “ They’re robbing letter carriers, they’re sticking a gun in a letter carrier’s face and they’re demanding arrow keys, ” laments Frank Albergo , president of the National Postal Police Union and a Postal Police Officer himself.  An "arrow key" in the context of the Post Office is a specialized, universal key that postal workers use to access various locked mail receptacles, including collection boxes, apartment mailboxes, and cluster boxes. Albergo isn’t exaggerating—research shows over 100 physical assaul...
Read more