Skip to main content

The DOE Shuffle: Washington Redistributes the Homework — U.S. Department of Education Getting Pink Slip

(Now Starring the Departments of Labor, HHS, Interior — and a Cameo by Title I)

Imagine a bureaucracy moving day where the cardboard boxes are full of grant guidance, civil-rights files, and enough acronyms to wallpaper a school gym. 

That’s basically what happened this week when the U.S. Department of Education quietly signed six interagency agreements to hand off billions in grant programs to four other federal agencies — with the Department of Labor poised to manage some of the largest K-12 funding streams, including Title I for schools serving low-income students.

Department officials said the programs will continue to be funded at levels set by Congress. 

That line — short, soothing, and repeated across press releases — is the government equivalent of telling the class, “the test will still be graded,” while a substitute is setting off the fire alarm.

Why the shuffle? 

The White House and Education Secretary Linda McMahon are calling it a bureaucratic slimming plan: cut layers, return authority to states, and let other agencies (Labor, HHS, Interior, State) operate programs “in ways that better align with workforce goals, health services, and local needs.” 

The splintering is real: K-12 programs, after years under a single roof, are being parceled out with the cheeriness of a teacher saying, “Group project! You get Labor. You get Interior. You get a spreadsheet!”

It’s tempting to line up pros and cons like desks in a classroom. So — let’s!!

Pros (what the administration and free-market fans will tell you)

  • Local control and flexibility: With fewer central diktats, states and districts can pursue curricula and policies they actually want. Think more local flavor, less one-size federal seasoning.

  • Reduced bureaucracy and cost: If you believe the federal department is a slow-moving bureaucracy that sips too much copier toner, dissolving it should free cash for frontline education (in theory).

  • Increased innovation: No single federal curriculum police could mean a burst of experiments — charters, micro-credentials, new credentialing models, and possibly a stunning array of dashboards.

  • Constitutional tidy-up: Some argue education wasn’t in the Founders’ job description. So decentralize and call it “returning power to the people.”

  • Perceived ineffectiveness addressed: Critics say the Department’s decades of spending haven’t cured low test scores — change the institution, change the pacing.

Cons (what superintendents, unions, civil-rights advocates and special-ed lawyers warn)

  • Loss of educational equity & civil-rights protections: The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) enforces laws that shield students from discrimination based on race, disability, or gender. Handing those responsibilities to agencies that don’t specialize in school civil-rights enforcement could weaken protections for the most vulnerable.

  • Fragmented expertise: Title I, IDEA, special education, and bilingual services are complex. Handoff to agencies with different missions (Labor, Interior, HHS) risks losing the nuanced knowledge that school districts rely on.

  • Coordination headaches: How do you “co-mingle” funds for a child who is low-income, a multilingual learner and eligible for special services when four agencies each have a piece of the puzzle? Rhode Island’s K-12 chief Angélica Infante-Green warned exactly that: funding is more than checks — it’s how you stitch services together.

  • Accountability & transparency risks: Splitting rules across agencies may create loopholes, delays, and confusion for states and parents who need a single federal point of contact.

  • Political and practical risk: Even if Congress keeps funding levels the same, who writes the guidance, trains state staff, and monitors compliance? Those tiny process decisions matter — a lot.

So what does this mean for parents, teachers and the kid whose IEP is currently being discussed in a meeting they can’t attend? 

Short answer: Uncertainty...

The administration promises continuity — “programs will continue to be funded at levels set by Congress” — yet change is already rippling through grant offices, state liaisons and union hallways.

Possible futures:

  • Optimistic: Agencies coordinate, the Labor Department helps align K-12 to career pathways, and states use flexibility to innovate responsibly.

  • Pessimistic: Services fray, civil-rights enforcement becomes patchwork, and districts spend two years updating forms while students’ needs get lost in a game of bureaucratic hot potato.

Either way, the nation is about to learn whether education is best run as a single, specialized federal agency — or as a cooperative jigsaw puzzle wearing the logos of Labor, 

HHS, Interior, and State. Parents and educators should take note: you may soon need to file a complaint at an agency you never thought you’d visit!


12th Grade Skills Hit New Low: Why the Nation’s Report Card Reads Like a Broken Scroll

“No paywall. No puppets. Just local truth. Chip in $3 today” at https://buymeacoffee.com/doublejeopardynews

“Enjoy this content without corporate censorship? Help keep it that way.”

“Ad-Free. Algorithm-Free. 100% Independent. Support now.”


#SchoolhouseShuffle #DismantleED #TitleITransfer #DeptOfLaborED #EducationReorg #LocalControlDebate #CivilRightsAtRisk #SixAgreements #EducationPolicy #EdDeptClosure #FundingLevelsSetByCongress #StateFlexibility #ProgramFragmentation #OCRConcerns #K12FundingShift

Sources (brief): AP News coverage of Nov. 18, 2025 actions; official U.S. Department of Education press release announcing six interagency agreements (Nov. 18, 2025); Department of Labor joint announcement of the Elementary & Secondary partnership; Education Week and K12Dive reporting on program moves and Title I oversight; PBS NewsHour and LA Times analysis of the reorganization and reactions from state chiefs and advocates. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Please Help Find These Forgotten Girls Held at Male Juvenile Prison for Over a Year!

  MY MOST IMPORTANT STORY  Dozens of Forgotten Little Girls Held at Male Juvenile Prison for Over a Year! Welcome to the Sunshine State , where the palm trees sway, the alligators lurk, and the legislative process makes Kafka look like a life coach!  Florida House Bill HB21 . Not just a compensation bill but possibly a 20 million dollar "Stay out of Jail Free" card for some folks. This is a bill that does some good—but also trips over its own shoelaces, falls down a staircase, and lands on a historical oversight so big, it might as well have its own zip code! An oversight that overlooks what I consider to be its most vulnerable victims! The Setup: Justice with a Catch HB21 was enacted on July 1, 2024 to compensate victims of abuse from two male juvenile detention facilities located in Florida, Dozier and Okeechobee.  It says, “Hey, survivors of abuse between 1940 and 1975, here’s some compensation for the horrific things you endured!” Sounds good, right? Like...
Post a Comment
Read more

Here's A New HOA Rule Dictating What You Can Do Inside Your Home

HOA Overreach: When Your Own Home Isn’t Really Your Own The joys of homeownership—the American dream!  That magical place where you can paint the walls any color you like, blast your music (within reason), and enjoy the simple pleasure of—wait, never mind..... Turns out, your HOA might have something to say about what you do inside your own four walls. Case in point: A longtime homeowner, who has peacefully lived in his residence for 25 years, was blindsided when his HOA suddenly banned smoking inside individual homes.  That’s right—after a quarter-century of no issues, he was informed that lighting up indoors was no longer an option.  The new rule, passed at the HOA’s annual meeting by a majority vote, now restricts smoking to a designated outdoor area. Now, while some might see this as a health-conscious decision, the homeowner—whose wife is a smoker—sees it as an unfair overreach.  In a letter to a local publication, he expressed frustration, writing, “I’ve live...
Post a Comment
Read more

Postal Police Stuck Behind ‘Keep Out’ Signs While Mailmen Face Muggers: You Can’t Make This Stuff Up!!

As crime against letter carriers surges, one would think that America’s armed, uniformed Postal Police might be hitting the streets to protect our mail.  Instead, they’re still glued to their post office entrances like sentries guarding Fort Frownmore.  Why?  Because since 2020, the Postmaster General decreed they must “protect postal property” only—meaning, they currently serve as glorified lobby bouncers rather than actual roaming guardians of the mailstream. “ They’re robbing letter carriers, they’re sticking a gun in a letter carrier’s face and they’re demanding arrow keys, ” laments Frank Albergo , president of the National Postal Police Union and a Postal Police Officer himself.  An "arrow key" in the context of the Post Office is a specialized, universal key that postal workers use to access various locked mail receptacles, including collection boxes, apartment mailboxes, and cluster boxes. Albergo isn’t exaggerating—research shows over 100 physical assaul...
Post a Comment
Read more