Skip to main content

Too Little Truth: Crest Sued For Overenthusiastic Kids Toothpaste Tube Art

In the latest turn of events proving that packaging copywriters and pediatric dentists do not always share the same moral universe, a federal judge has allowed a lawsuit to proceed questioning whether Crest’s box art encourages kids to slather on more toothpaste than is safe. 

Yes, the cartoon that looks suspiciously like a full-length toothpaste strip on a toothbrush might now be the subject of serious courtroom scrutiny — and a parade of very worried parents.

U.S. District Judge Jorge Alonso green-lit the parents’ motion, noting that the picture on Procter & Gamble’s boxes — showing an entire ribbon of toothpaste atop a child’s toothbrush — could indeed violate state consumer protection laws if it leads children to ingest unsafe amounts of fluoride

“The fact that swallowing fluoride poses health risks to children is an essential element of the story plaintiffs are telling; it is the reason for the recommendation that they use only a smear or dab,” Judge Alonso said. 

In plain English: if your packaging looks like cake frosting for a toddler’s brush, you might be on the hook when someone actually eats the frosting.

Why the fuss? 

Fluoride is a tooth-defender — the World Health Organization pegs the safe fluoride concentration in toothpaste at about 1,000 to 1,500 parts per million

But ingesting too much fluoride can cause dental fluorosis, a cosmetic discoloration that the Cleveland Clinic notes isn’t painful but is certainly not on anyone’s birthday wish list. 

For that reason, pediatric guidance is clear: for young children, use only a smear or a pea-sized dab and encourage vigorous spitting (and maybe a therapist for packaging-induced disappointment).

Procter & Gamble tried to shut the case down, arguing that federal law preempts the claim and that its instructions are clear. 

The judge wasn’t ready to back-flip on dismissing the suit entirely. 

The decision leaves room for parents to probe whether the smiling tube on the box is more advertising flourish than public-health safe practice. 

Meanwhile, Colgate — perhaps reading the toothpaste-splattered writing on the bathroom wall — quietly agreed to change its packaging after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton negotiated a settlement. 

Colgate and Tom’s of Maine replaced their full-strip imagery with the now-fashionable “pea-sized” amount, rolling out new packaging on November 1, 2025.

Enter the billboard of modern life: if your brand sells an item that can be harmful when consumed in excess, your pictures had better toe the line between aspirational and actionable. 

Otherwise, a parent will spot it, and a lawyer will smell opportunity. 

The case comes at an awkward time for fluoride politics in general. 

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s moves on policy this year — including plans to have the CDC step back from recommending fluoridation — have amplified the debate. 

Kennedy praised Utah Governor Spencer Cox for banning fluoride in drinking water, saying, “I’m very, very proud of this state for being the first state to ban it, and I hope many more will,” a line that delighted anti-fluoride activists and terrified dental hygienists everywhere.

But public-health groups caution against jumping to alarm. 

The American Cancer Society says most studies “have not found a strong link” between cancer and water fluoride levels, and federal public-health bodies long defended fluoridation as a major factor in reducing tooth decay, especially in under-resourced communities. 

The toothpaste lawsuit, then, is not really about whether fluoride helps teeth — it’s about whether packaging can reasonably be read as an instruction manual to overuse it.

Whatever the outcome, expect shelf art to get a makeover. 

Brands that once treated box imagery like a tiny billboard for optimism may need to hire pediatric toxicologists as consultants. 

Maybe future toothpaste boxes will look less like a dessert menu and more like a stern parent: “One pea. Spit. Repeat.” 

Until then, parents might want to keep the toothpaste cap on (literally) and teach kids that not everything pretty-looking is edible — especially if it fights cavities.


Toothpaste’s Revenge: Scientists Race to Grow Real Teeth (So Dentists Can Finally Retire to the Bahamas)

“No paywall. No puppets. Just local truth. Chip in $3 today” at https://buymeacoffee.com/doublejeopardynews

“Enjoy this content without corporate censorship? Help keep it that way.”

“Ad-Free. Algorithm-Free. 100% Independent. Support now.”


#TooMuchToothpaste #CrestCaper #JudgeAlonso #PeaSizedPlease #FluorideFacts #ToothpasteArtFail #ParentingVsPackaging #SpitDontSwallow #ColgatePeaSize #RFKJrFluorideDebate #PublicHealthVsPR #DentalFluorosis #PediatricSafetyFirst #PackagingLiability #ToothpasteTrial

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Please Help Find These Forgotten Girls Held at Male Juvenile Prison for Over a Year!

  MY MOST IMPORTANT STORY  Dozens of Forgotten Little Girls Held at Male Juvenile Prison for Over a Year! Welcome to the Sunshine State , where the palm trees sway, the alligators lurk, and the legislative process makes Kafka look like a life coach!  Florida House Bill HB21 . Not just a compensation bill but possibly a 20 million dollar "Stay out of Jail Free" card for some folks. This is a bill that does some good—but also trips over its own shoelaces, falls down a staircase, and lands on a historical oversight so big, it might as well have its own zip code! An oversight that overlooks what I consider to be its most vulnerable victims! The Setup: Justice with a Catch HB21 was enacted on July 1, 2024 to compensate victims of abuse from two male juvenile detention facilities located in Florida, Dozier and Okeechobee.  It says, “Hey, survivors of abuse between 1940 and 1975, here’s some compensation for the horrific things you endured!” Sounds good, right? Like...

We Are Temporarily Halting Further Publication....

Do to financial issues and lack of funding we are temporarily halting further publication. After a full year of publication, we have reached a bridge that we are unable to cross at this time. We may periodically publish an article but at this time, full-time publication is no longer feasible. Thank you to all the readers who followed us throughout our journey and we wish you the very best. Hopefully we will see our way through this rough patch and will resume publication in the near future. Thanks again! Robert B.

Postal Police Stuck Behind ‘Keep Out’ Signs While Mailmen Face Muggers: You Can’t Make This Stuff Up!!

As crime against letter carriers surges, one would think that America’s armed, uniformed Postal Police might be hitting the streets to protect our mail.  Instead, they’re still glued to their post office entrances like sentries guarding Fort Frownmore.  Why?  Because since 2020, the Postmaster General decreed they must “protect postal property” only—meaning, they currently serve as glorified lobby bouncers rather than actual roaming guardians of the mailstream. “ They’re robbing letter carriers, they’re sticking a gun in a letter carrier’s face and they’re demanding arrow keys, ” laments Frank Albergo , president of the National Postal Police Union and a Postal Police Officer himself.  An "arrow key" in the context of the Post Office is a specialized, universal key that postal workers use to access various locked mail receptacles, including collection boxes, apartment mailboxes, and cluster boxes. Albergo isn’t exaggerating—research shows over 100 physical assaul...