Musk vs. Trump: When Friendly Fire Hits Social Media

-

 

It was only last week that Elon Musk and President Donald Trump appeared cordial, celebrating Musk’s departure from his informal White House role with an Oval Office photo op. 

Fast-forward a few days, and the proverbial friendship bracelet has snapped: Musk and Trump are now publicly disagreeing, and both are airing grievances on social media.

The “Big, Beautiful Bill” Clash

The spark seems to be Trump’s much-discussed spending package—nicknamed the “big, beautiful bill”—which includes tax cuts, Medicaid reductions, and a substantial border security allocation.  

Elon Musk publicly criticized the measure on X (formerly Twitter), calling it “a massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill [that] is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it. You know you did wrong. You know it.” 

He urged followers to “Kill the Bill,” claiming that it would “bankrupt America.”

In response, Donald Trump told reporters he was “very disappointed with Elon” and questioned whether their relationship could recover. 

Musk fired back, “Without me, Trump would have lost the election. Such ingratitude.” 

Whether Musk’s objections were entirely ideological or partially driven by the bill’s reduction of electric vehicle incentives (a direct concern for Musk’s Tesla) is a matter of debate.

Alleged Tensions over EV Mandates

Among the items reportedly stoking Trump’s frustration was Musk’s support for maintaining an EV mandate that required automakers to ensure a certain percentage of electric vehicles were sold. 

Trump tweeted that he had “told Elon to leave, took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!” 

This suggests that Musk’s business interests might factor into the spat, though many observers note that high-profile supporters of electric vehicles have clashed with Trump on policy before.

The NASA Nominee Withdrawal

Another source of tension involved the withdrawal of Jared Isaacman’s nomination to lead NASA. Trump’s administration “allegedly” rescinded Isaacman’s nomination after discovering past political donations to Democrats. 

Isaacman, a friend of Musk, had been a prominent figure within SpaceX-related circles.  

CNN reported that Trump’s inner circle “allegedly” objected to Isaacman’s political history, even though his bipartisan contributions had been public knowledge. 

This move was widely perceived as payback for Musk’s earlier criticism.

The Missing $100 Million Pledge

Adding to the drama, multiple reports “allege” that Musk promised $100 million to support Trump’s political efforts but never actually delivered the funds. 

According to The New York Times and other outlets, Trump’s team felt slighted when the money did not materialize, further straining their rapport. 

Musk has not publicly clarified this point in detail, and it remains unclear whether the pledge was formalized through a signed agreement.

From “Hatchet” to “Scalpel”

Early in Trump’s second term, Musk was granted a somewhat unusual position as a “special government employee,” during which he “allegedly” influenced personnel changes, contracts, and policy discussions—earning him comparisons to an unofficial White House COO. 

However, in early March, after complaints from several Cabinet secretaries, Trump “allegedly” told Musk to use a “scalpel, not a hatchet” when recommending governmental changes. 

This apparent demotion reportedly disappointed Musk, who had been accustomed to a high degree of influence.

Musk is said to have asked if he could remain on as a special advisor beyond the typical 120-day limit, but he was “allegedly” told no. 

His final weeks in the White House grew tense, particularly after he “allegedly” attempted to derail a major AI investment deal that Trump later announced on a Middle East trip.

Neutral Perspective

Each camp presents its side: Musk frames his opposition to the spending bill as principled and publicly spirited, while Trump views Musk’s criticism as a personal betrayal—particularly given Musk’s previous advocacy for certain policies. 

Observers note that the EV credits in the new bill would have direct implications for Tesla’s bottom line, suggesting a possible business motive behind Musk’s public outcry. 

Meanwhile, Trump’s administration has been accused of retaliating against Musk’s allies, exemplified by the Isaacman nomination withdrawal.

Both Musk and Trump wield significant influence, yet in the current political climate, few elected Republicans appear willing to publicly side with Musk against Trump. 

The broader question remains whether Musk’s vocal opposition can genuinely sway key votes on Capitol Hill, potentially sinking the bill despite the GOP’s slim majority.

Looking Ahead

For now, the Musk–Trump feud serves as a reminder that alliances in Washington can be fleeting. 

Their fast-paced drama underscores how personal relationships, business interests, and policy disagreements intersect at the highest levels of power. 

Whether this standoff will impact legislative outcomes or merely remain another chapter in Elon Musk’s public life is anyone’s guess—but it’s safe to say the spectacle has already provided more headlines than many congressional hearings.

The Art of Lying: From Watergate to “Whatever!!” 

 

Please support my writing by donating $1 at https://buymeacoffee.com/doublejeopardynews

  

  1. #MuskTrumpFeud

  2. #BigBeautifulBillDrama

  3. #EVMandateWar

  4. #NASANomineeSaga

  5. #HundredMillionMystery

  6. #PublicEnemyNo2And3

  7. #ScalpelNotHatchet

  8. #OvalOfficeDrama

  9. #TeslaPolitics

  10. #CryptoCommander

  11. #SpaceXvsWhiteHouse

  12. #PoliticalBromanceBreakup

  13. #TwitterSpats2025

  14. #CleanEnergyClash

  15. #DuelingTweets

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Please Help Find These Forgotten Girls Held at Male Juvenile Prison for Over a Year!

-
Image
  MY MOST IMPORTANT STORY  Dozens of Forgotten Little Girls Held at Male Juvenile Prison for Over a Year! Welcome to the Sunshine State, where the palm trees sway, the alligators lurk, and the legislative process makes Kafka look like a life coach!  Florida House Bill HB21. Not just a compensation bill but possibly a 20 million dollar "Stay out of Jail Free" card for some folks. This is a bill that does some good—but also trips over its own shoelaces, falls down a staircase, and lands on a historical oversight so big, it might as well have its own zip code! An oversight that overlooks what I consider to be its most vulnerable victims! The Setup: Justice with a Catch HB21 was enacted on July 1, 2024 to compensate victims of abuse from two male juvenile detention facilities located in Florida, Dozier and Okeechobee.  It says, “Hey, survivors of abuse between 1940 and 1975, here’s some compensation for the horrific things you endured!” Sounds good, right? Like a le...
Read more

Here's A New HOA Rule Dictating What You Can Do Inside Your Home

-
Image
HOA Overreach: When Your Own Home Isn’t Really Your Own The joys of homeownership—the American dream!  That magical place where you can paint the walls any color you like, blast your music (within reason), and enjoy the simple pleasure of—wait, never mind..... Turns out, your HOA might have something to say about what you do inside your own four walls. Case in point: A longtime homeowner, who has peacefully lived in his residence for 25 years, was blindsided when his HOA suddenly banned smoking inside individual homes.  That’s right—after a quarter-century of no issues, he was informed that lighting up indoors was no longer an option.  The new rule, passed at the HOA’s annual meeting by a majority vote, now restricts smoking to a designated outdoor area. Now, while some might see this as a health-conscious decision, the homeowner—whose wife is a smoker—sees it as an unfair overreach.  In a letter to a local publication, he expressed frustration, writing, “I’ve live...
Read more

Postal Police Stuck Behind ‘Keep Out’ Signs While Mailmen Face Muggers: You Can’t Make This Stuff Up!!

-
Image
As crime against letter carriers surges, one would think that America’s armed, uniformed Postal Police might be hitting the streets to protect our mail.  Instead, they’re still glued to their post office entrances like sentries guarding Fort Frownmore.  Why?  Because since 2020, the Postmaster General decreed they must “protect postal property” only—meaning, they currently serve as glorified lobby bouncers rather than actual roaming guardians of the mailstream. “ They’re robbing letter carriers, they’re sticking a gun in a letter carrier’s face and they’re demanding arrow keys, ” laments Frank Albergo , president of the National Postal Police Union and a Postal Police Officer himself.  An "arrow key" in the context of the Post Office is a specialized, universal key that postal workers use to access various locked mail receptacles, including collection boxes, apartment mailboxes, and cluster boxes. Albergo isn’t exaggerating—research shows over 100 physical assaul...
Read more